Pages

This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

2013년 7월 7일 일요일

Minjok & 21 century


Common conception of Minjok 
 The concept of Minjok exists in this world by many different and unique meanings. Korea also has this concept of Minjok, however people justifies it differently. Some might justify Minjok as someone who is in same unified community or someone who is living in same country. In the dictionary, Minjok is expressed as living together in a certain area for many years on the basis of commonality of language and culture, historically formed social groups. However, Minjok cannot be simply described as a social group. Social group is something that seeks mutual profit which is different from what Minjok is. For example in a movie, when we see our Minjok getting hit by someone, and being suffered, we seem to become angrier than other people. Also, we seem to focus more on the movie when the main character is our Minjok. Thus, is Minjok simply a social group? I disagree with this and that how I would justify Korean Minjok would be based on resistance awareness which firstly focuses on a thought of unified nation and has outstanding unity as homogenous nation.
Dangun Minjok

 There are two strong historical arguments on the origin of nationalism. There are two big opposition points on how most of the Koreans think the word nationalism firstly existed since Dangun and how it started since Japanese colonization. I will be firstly talking about the argument about how Dangun is the origin of nationalism. Most of the people think that the origin of nationalism came since Dangun. A fighter of independence and a socialistic historian Shin Chae Ho wrote a book called "New reading of History", which contains a summary from the period of Dangun to disruption of Balhae. This book also argues that the Dangun is the origin of nationalism. There are two other areas to focus in this book as well. Since long time ago, even though 한민족(Han Minjok) fought for extending territories as enemies, when there were attacks from foreign powers, they came back as one united nation. This resulted Koreans to bravely stand up for their identity also followed by creation of resistance awareness. Therefore, even with Japanese colonization, people never gave up to resist. However on the other hand, there are people apposing to argue that nationalism was created since Japanese colonization. They argue that oppositions just want to simply believe that nationalism was created since Dangun however in reality, it was created from Japanese colonization. From the research Korean Ethnic Nationalism by B.R Myers, Japan forced the nation to use Japanese and its cultural name. However as this forceful policy failed, Japan used something called "blood line share" to increase pride in Koreans and unify them as one nation. This was a trick by Japanese for Koreans to be influenced to Japanese culture. However the research by B.R Myers is realistically false. From Korean history, when Japan first started cultural ruling, they said Korea is the best to make pro-Japaense groups in Korea which made internal conflicts in order for Japan to take over Korea. However, this failed as well which led to disruption of the nation. As people suffered from disruption policies, they unified 3.1 movement. 
Japanese colonization
3.1 movement



 Many people say that after this, many of independent movements and provisional government were created with creation of concept of Minjok in Manchuria as well. During Japanese colonization, what Japan put up to destroy Korea was “Great East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere” and “Pan-Asiatic identity”. These truths incapacitated two arguments in agreeing with the invasion by Shin Chae Ho and Lee Kwang Soo. Lee Kwang Soo was a fighter of independence and liberalism who was actively involved in the movements of independence. The biggest movement he did was being involved in the farmer(Dong Hak) movement. This was the very first movement which army rose in the cause of justice. The focusing point here is that this was the first movement resisting against the foreign power and Lee Kwang Soo claimed that national conscious was created. However, Shin Chae Ho disagreed with the national conscious that based the idea that Japan and Korea are one from Dangun. In my own opinion, I agree with Lee Kwang Soo’s argument. In reality, since Dangun, most of Hanbando was divided and still is till today. Therefore, the argument that national conscious was created during Dangun is a denial of Japanese colonization that it never happened. Thus, this historical truth argues that Korean Minjok is resentful and people integrate easily.



             A book called "The paradox of Korean Globalization" by a graduate of Korean Minjok Leadership Academy Shin Gi Wook states that there is a contradiction in Korean society. The contradiction appears in the two opposite meanings of nationalism and globalization. Korea is what so-called "a nation of digital guinea pigs" because of its well developed technology. With these technologies it made it possible to communicate with different countries and creation of globalized companies like Samsung and LG. Also, many people are now studying overseas and studies like TOEIC AND TOEFL are considered important. This is the reason why Korea is a globalized country.
Globalization


 On the other hand, ethnocentrial nationalism exists in competitions like World Cup and Olympic as we use "taehan min guk" ("republic or Korea" or "The great Han people's state") or "Uri nun hana"("we are one"). We also learn Korean history as sharing the blood line in common ancestors in classes in Korea. With this, we are one nation, in other word one Minjok in our minds. Even though the characteristic that unification is strong for a better communication between countries, the book by Shin Gi Wook states that Korea's ethnic identity is too strong that world's current trend of globalization is one of the ways for nationalism. In other word, globalization is being used to create stronger nationalism. For example, after the Korean war, with the help from America, Korea quickly recovered. Also, after seizing power of Jung He Park during 1960s, even though democracy could not develop much, the military seized in power which improved economy and many of the businesses were created in Seoul. As the government and businesses united, technology was developed in Seoul along with other cities. This resulted Seoul's industry to be centralized and businesses went overseas. However with restrictions from the government, foreign businesses could not enter Seoul which showed Korean nationalism. Thus, there was a decrease in foreigners in Seoul. However, after the Olympics in 1988, foreigners came to Seoul without the purpose of occupation and the foreign businesses were created for the first time. In 1993, the president Young Sam Kim who was elected democratically led globalization for the first time which allowed to accept American businesses and for Seoul to be developed as a city. However, after the IMF crisis in 1997, as unemployment rate increased and the country was in crisis, IMF suggested for Korea to open as a complete free market. Korea agreed to do so and it actively processed globalization. To pay off the debt from IMF and to recover from the crisis, citizens got together to do fundraise and save the country's budget as much as possible. From this it is also evident that the Korean nation acted for the profit of the community before individuals. It was impossible to find this movement from any of other countries in the world. As globalization is still continuing, there are some elder people who believe in Confucianism and American objects are only popular to younger generations. However, these differences were recovered by the unity of the nation and elders are now familiar with developed items as well.
Nationalism
 As it is being globalized, there is a bit of a flow in nationalism in the West. In olden times in the West, the King had absolute power. However, the Rousseau in Romantic period claimed the thought and the theory of social contract. It claimed that these two are what Humans enjoy inevitably like the life, freedom and wealth which cannot be transferred. This is what made it doubt the kingdom and led to civil revolution. After this, Napoleon combined independent countries under France Empire. The West’s nationalism appeared when Napoleon was thrown out. Countries realized the need of independency and went back to normal. So they had conference in Bin, which is called  Congress of wien. Western countries developed more with keeping independency and interchanging between countries. How the country based its own country to spread foreign objects made 21st century Korea to have this type of characteristic of Minjok.
Bin conference




21 century Minjok
             The concept of Minjok continuously changed since the past to now. It is evident that how people take the meaning of Minjok are all different. How Minjok was interpreted till now was community’s conscious of sense of kinship and fellowship, and 21st centralized meaning of Minjok is out of the restriction of the nation and will find sense of kinship and fellowship. As mentioned previously, there is a contradiction in nationalism based on globalization and historical truth. As its accommodating nationalism became like the process of globalization from little bit of foreign power, the concept of Minjok in the 21st century seem to change from simple concept of Korean Minjok to globalized Minjok.


<Bibliography>


http://www.ucalgary.ca/ev/designresearch/projects/Evds723/seoul.pdf
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nationalism/
http://www.globalpolicy.org/globalization.html
http://struggle.ws/talks/korea.html


Shin Ki Wook, “Paradox of Korean globalization”
Shin Chae Ho, "New reading of History"